I listen to radio 4 on the BBC network and they have a programme called “thought for the day” which is why I have added an A to the front of the title incase I’m infringing copyright.
The radio programme is what it says, a thought, but from a religious perspective. A lot of people have been calling for non religious thoughts to be included. Sometimes it seems as if the talk is non religious but then there is a twist at the end.
Why is it assumed that only if you are religious can you have morals? Why are we still held by the assumption that good things are only possible with the will of a deity?
Don’t get me wrong, I do not think religions are bad. I have been bought up in the Christian faith and I have many friends who follow various religions.
My main quibble is that some people do good because they are promised a reward in heaven. I don’t know what I think of an afterlife but I do think that if you are not religious you can still be good. In fact if you do not have a religion and are not expecting a reward and just do things for the greater good does that give a moral superiority?
I don’t go as far as that, but I enjoy giving people help and assistance. Humans need to care more for one another and not base their ideas on what tribe we belong to. Perhaps that is something we should consider if we want this planet to continue
What do you think? Why not comment ….
X

Christine, you should read Martha Kennedy’s book, The Brothers’ Path. I’m sure she would be interested in your comments on it, since this question is touched on in her book, albeit from a 15th century perspective. Kind Regards. Tracy.
LikeLike
Thank you. I will have to ask her about it.
LikeLike